Tuesday, April 24, 2012

This is the Film Analysis assignment I shared at our April meeting. Students use screen capture to collect stills from the film, but this could be rvised as a more digital web-page type assignment if students collected snippets of film instead of or in addition to stills.


Film Analysis Assignment

Goals for this project:
1) Learn about a new discourse community and become familiar with the idea of a discourse community.

2) Learn a set of terms that you then apply and thereby begin to see something (in this case, film) in a more specialized way.

3) Learn or develop observation skills to use in future papers. Describing a moving picture and taking notes on dialogue approximates and is good practice for interviewing, which you’ll do later.


Assignment Basics

Deadlines: The rough draft is due for workshop on 2/24. I expect this draft to be quite rough. The final draft, should you choose to revise this paper, is due with the rest of the portfolio on 5/4.

Length: 6 full pages minimum for the rough draft; finished drafts tend to be longer. At least 4.5 pages of the rough draft needs to be your writing. In addition to the writing, I recommend that you include a few well-chosen graphics (such as film stills or sketches). You can insert these individually, but also consider grouping a few shots to give your reader a sense of the movement within a scene (see the Yale site’s example under “Diegesis”). Screenshots are remarkably easy to make and integrate. If you can view your film on a computer, see the Help files for instructions on how to take a screenshot.

Sources: On your last page (not a separate page) include a Work Cited entry for the film, or a Works Cited list if you use more sources. I do not encourage you to use outside sources in the rough draft, but if you do, all sources must be cited: 1) listed on the Works Cited, 2) mentioned in the text where there ideas or words appear, and 3) set off with quotation marks, if you use their words.

Film Choice

Choose a film you find worth examining and that I approve. I might need to chat with you about the film before I feel comfortable approving it. This does not need to be your favorite movie, an undisputed classic, etc, but it should be complex and meaningful. Since we are doing a film analysis and not a review, it is important that your film have some interesting formal qualities. A film with an interesting theme or script but nothing special about the way it is shot, edited, lit, designed, etc. is not going to work.

Choose a film you will be able to view multiple times, especially if you intend to revise this paper for your portfolio.

Do not choose a children’s movie, documentary, or “short.” In other words, do choose a full-length fictional or fictionalized film meant for adults. Clear your film choice with me by 2/10, preferably, or at your week five conference at the latest. Do not settle on a film before I approve it.

Approach

We will study some websites to develop a vocabulary for talking and writing about film. Dartmouth’s guide explains what a film analysis is in very simple terms and gives a short glossary, the “Syntax of Film: A Glossary” source gives illustrations and more terms, and Yale’s site gives more detail about—and film clips to illustrate—the terms introduced at the other sites.

These URLs are listed here for your convenience but are also on Blackboard. You’ll need to read them and keep a double-entry journal started on Wednesday 2/8 and completed by your week five conference.

It’s important to note that the film analysis is not a simple critique or review; it focuses on formal qualities such as scenes, editing, lighting, etc. In this sense, formal does not mean the opposite of casual; it refers to what is observable in the film. Just as a “formal” art analysis focuses on the formal qualities of line, color, shape, texture, and so on, this type of film analysis focuses on the way the scenes are set up and the film is put together.

Yale’s site gives an example of a true shot-by shot analysis. Since we are all amateurs just being introduced to the idea, I don’t think we’ll do anything so strict, but we will include a significant amount of formal analysis into our papers. The formal analysis should not be an afterthought; it should be an integral part of the paper.

Think of it as a critical analysis paper in which you record your thoughts about the movie with specific observations using accurate terms—informed by the glossaries. You will include your overall thoughts on the film as well as close analysis of 1-3 key scenes/moments in the film, using the terms we’ll learn from the online guides.

Thesis Statement

A critical analysis is a type of argument. Your finished draft should include an appropriate thesis statement that relies on support from the film. Quotes from the dialogue, descriptions of the shots, and images from the film should all work together to support an interpretive claim you make about the film. Interpretive claims focus on the significance or meaning of the work.

Do not attempt to perfect your thesis statement before you begin the rough draft. Let the thesis statement evolve as you work on the paper.


Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Watergate

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304356604577341883244096256.html

Technology+Technical Difficulties

I have half a share for everyone today. Maybe it's a 3/4 share. I had intended to put up a link to my full Twitter assignment sequence that I used in my English 102 class as an experiment in making the research process more social and more about sharing. You'll have to stay tuned for that.

In the mean time, I have shared, via a public posting of an Evernote note, a brief bibliography of digital literacy sources that I've found interesting. I tried to include some sources outside of composition (our education colleagues have some great studies). Then, to make it super digital crazy, I Tweeted the link. So, if you've never really used Twitter, now is your chance. Go to my account @emilysimnitt. The link should be my most recent Tweet. (It's also here if you are a Twitter-phobe).

I will post my Twitter assignment later (and spare you the technical difficulties that prevented it from being posted earlier). In the mean time, you can find the digital assignments a group of us at BSU presented on last fall at our Teaching Composition with Digital Technology blog (which I've tried to occasionally update with my digital adventures).

And one more link to a very cool resource: The Digital Archive of Literacy Narratives is a collection of people being recorded talking about their literacy experiences. I'll talk about an assignment sequence Lynn Reid (IUP PhD student) uses in Basic Writing related to the archive. It's a good starting place to talking about and using digital media in writing; it's digital; it's about literacy.

Saturday, April 14, 2012

“Changing the Mix of Learning with Mobile Media Tools”

I went to a CTL workshop called “Changing the Mix of Learning with Mobile Media Tools” and thought I would share the ideas here since our next discussion is about digital literacy.

The facilitator, Eric Orton, showed us a number of apps and explained ways to use them to “flip the classroom” (or move lecture outside of class and move more experimental and interactive activities to the classroom). The apps were demonstrated on an iPad but could be used on iPhones, iPod Touch, or in some cases on a regular computer.

First, we were advised to use “Dropbox” rather than Blackboard to store and publish materials for students, as it is easier to use from a mobile device. We should create private folders for our raw materials as well as some folders to share with each class.

With all of our raw materials in dropbox, we can use an app like “Expain Everything” (free screen capture) to build and annotate slides using our photos or diagrams. We can add audio commentary to the slides to build brief lectures/explanations for students to view outside of class. Kimberly Pierce was at the workshop and mentioned that this might be a good app to use to mark up small sections of student writing, though Orton mentioned that it does not allow for a whole paper to be marked up, at least not easily.

Pocket WavePad HD (or non-HD for iPhone or iPod touch) we can use for more considered audio projects because it allows for easy editing of mistakes. You can view the sound waves and easily edit and rearrange your lecture. Orton also mentioned Audacity.sourceforge.net for audio editing.

Splice Video Editor (free version) we can use to edit video on an iPad or even a phone, and Orton mentioned it as an easier alternative to iMovie for building video presentations. He also showed us “Coach's Eye” (a neat way to annotate video should you ever have the need to do that).

Socrative www.socrative.com was the best-received app of the day, as it allowed teachers to build quizzes that can be given very easily. Socrative turns any of the students’ mobile devices or laptops into clickers so that they can answer quiz questions or vote during class. The teacher can project the results on the overhead in the form of a chart showing how students voted, how many voted, etc.

These were all new to me, but I am not very technologically advanced, so maybe they are not new to you! If you have some digital assignments, apps, questions, gripes, etc. to discuss, please take this as an invitation to post them!